Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:21

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Forget Ray-Bans: The $399 Meta Oakley smart glasses are better in almost every way - ZDNET
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Netflix anime boosts Devil May Cry 5 sales to over 10m - Eurogamer
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Neurosteroids identified as potential therapy for treatment-resistant depression - Medical Xpress
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
TRUMP memecoin ‘hasn’t pumped’ after Eric Trump says WLF will buy big stack - Cointelegraph
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
This Cat Poop Parasite Can Decapitate Sperm—and It Might Be Fueling Infertility - Gizmodo
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Tether overtakes Tron, DEXs with $432M in revenue – How and what next? - AMBCrypto
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.